Financial Globalisation's Influence on Environmental Policies and Practices

 

Financial globalisation refers to cross-border capital flows. These include debt, equity, foreign direct investment (FDI) etc (Wei, 2018). Financial globalization may also be defined as a free movement of finance across national boundaries without restrictions (Sanjay, 2022).

Thus, it can be explained as the process that allows financial institutions (investment banks, mortgage companies, retail and commercial banks, insurance companies, brokerage firms etc) markets and services become more globally integrated. Hence, financial globalisation is about international capital flows, globalisation of financial services and cross border capital flows.

The result of successfully integrating the global financial market has been an increase in production and financial development, which has also led to economic growth (Erdogan, et al., 2020)One of the main underlying principles behind financial integration is the theory of comparative advantage, which proposes that countries should focus on producing goods they are most efficient at making (Johnson and Turner, 2010).

With countries specialising in the production of goods which they are most efficient at making, there has been a resultant increase in the scale of production because of increased trade (Bilgili, et al., 2020). Thus, it has been claimed that increased financial globalisation has resulted in a corresponding increase in the demand for foreign goods and services (Le, et al., 2016).

The increase in the scale of production of goods and services would thus lead to an increased pressure on natural resources, which would lead to a corresponding increase in the level of environmental degradation (Solarin, et al., 2017). Hence, if a country has comparative advantage in the production of goods that causes high levels of pollution, it will specialise in its production, and thereby increase pollutant emissions which will have a negative effect on environmental quality. China is often quoted as the best example of a country which through comparative advantage has become a global manufacturing powerhouse, with rapid export growth and a corresponding increase in the level of pollutants it emits which is causing extensive environmental deterioration (Le et al., 2016).

It should also be noted that Ulucak et al., (2020) noted that developing countries had a high tendency to specialise in “dirty” industries, whilst developed economies specialised in “clean” industries. They also explained that legally binding environmental regulations help in deciding the sectors countries specialise in.

Thus, countries with non-binding environmental regulations have a higher tendency to specialise in dirty industries and attract global dirty industries from other countries. This will in turn lead to a situation where polluting industries end up moving from developed to underdeveloped countries (Ulucak , et al., 2020).

It should further be noted that the increased production prompted by increased demand and financial growth occasioned by financial globalisation, has resulted in an increase in the demand for energy. Energy consumption increased from a ten-year annual average rate of 1.5% to 2.9% in 2018 (British Petroleum, 2019). With the primary energy used in production being oil, gas and coal, there has been a corresponding increase in green house gases emitted by industries which is contributing towards the degradation of the environment (Ullah et al., 2020: (Majeed, et al., 2020)

From the above, it can be noted that financial globalization has had a significant impact on environmental policies and practices worldwide. It has shaped the development of environmental policies through various channels, such as the flow of capital, trade liberalization, and the diffusion of environmental norms.

At the same time, global governance plays a crucial role in balancing economic growth and environmental sustainability by establishing standards and regulations, facilitating cooperation among nations, and promoting sustainable development.

One of the ways in which financial globalization has influenced environmental policies is through the flow of capital. The integration of financial markets across countries has led to increased investments in various sectors, including those with environmental implications.

Multinational corporations, for example, relocate their operations to countries with weaker environmental regulations to reduce costs. This can result in an environmental race to the bottom, where countries lower their standards to attract foreign investment.

On the other hand, financial globalization has also facilitated the transfer of knowledge and technologies related to sustainable practices. Foreign direct investment can bring advanced technologies and expertise, helping developing countries adopt cleaner production methods.

Trade liberalization, another aspect of financial globalization, has also shaped environmental policies. The removal of trade barriers has enabled the expansion of global supply chains, increasing the scale and intensity of production.

This has led to environmental concerns such as increased resource extraction, pollution, and greenhouse gas emissions. Moreover, trade liberalization can result in a reorganization of production across countries, with environmentally harmful industries relocated to countries with weaker regulations.

However, trade liberalization has also provided opportunities for environmental governance. Environmental clauses in trade agreements, such as those related to biodiversity conservation or the prohibition of trade in endangered species, can help promote sustainable practices and provide a framework for cooperation.

Financial globalisation has also influenced the diffusion of environmental norms. As countries become more interconnected through trade and investment, they are exposed to different environmental policies and practices. This exposure can lead to the adoption of international environmental standards and norms, as countries seek to conform to global expectations and avoid trade barriers.

International agreements and conventions, such as the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change and the Paris Agreement, have played a crucial role in setting global environmental norms and encouraging countries to adopt sustainable practices. These agreements provide a platform for global governance and cooperation, helping to balance economic growth with environmental sustainability.

Global governance plays a vital role in balancing economic growth and environmental sustainability by establishing standards and regulations. International organizations, such as the United Nations Environment Programme and the World Bank, play a crucial role in setting global environmental standards and providing technical assistance to countries. They also facilitate capacity building, financial support, and technology transfers to promote sustainable development. These organizations work closely with national governments, civil society, and the private sector to develop and implement environmental policies (CFR,2012).

Cooperation among nations is another essential component of global governance. Countries need to work together to address transboundary environmental issues, such as climate change, air and water pollution, and biodiversity loss. International agreements provide a framework for cooperation and negotiation, allowing countries to collaborate on environmental issues of mutual concern. Additionally, regional initiatives, such as the European Union's environmental policies and the Asia-Pacific Partnership on Clean Development and Climate, promote regional cooperation and the sharing of best practices (Cohen, 2020).

Balancing economic growth and environmental sustainability requires a holistic approach to development known as sustainable development. This concept acknowledges the interdependence of economic, social, and environmental dimensions of development. Through sustainable development, countries strive to meet the needs of the present generation without compromising the ability of future generations to meet their own needs. By integrating environmental considerations into economic decision-making, sustainable development aims to achieve a harmonious and balanced relationship between economic growth and environmental sustainability.

In conclusion, financial globalization has influenced environmental policies and practices worldwide through various channels such as capital flows, trade liberalization, and the diffusion of environmental norms. While it can lead to environmental challenges, it also provides opportunities for knowledge and technology transfer. Global governance plays a crucial role in balancing economic growth and environmental sustainability by establishing standards and regulations, facilitating cooperation among nations, and promoting sustainable development. Effective global governance is essential in addressing the complexities of environmental challenges, ensuring a balance between economic growth and environmental protection in a globalized world (UNEP, 2016).

 

 

References

·        Bilgili, F., Ulucak, R., Kocak, E. & Ilkay, S. C., 2020. Does Globalizatio Matter for Environmental Sustainability? Empirical Investigation for Turkey by Markovregime Switching Models. Environmental Science & Pollution Research International, 27(1), pp. 1087-1100.

·                       CFR. (2012, September 24). The United Nations and Future of Global Governance. Council on             Foreign Relations. Retrieved February 08, 2024, from https://www.cfr.org/expert-                        roundup/united- -and-future-global-governance

·                Cohen, S. (2020, January 27). Economic Growth and Environmental Sustainability. Columbia                     Climate School. Retrieved February 07, 2024, from          www.news.climate.columbia.edu/2020/01/27/economic-growth-environmental-sustainability/

·        Erdogan, S., Yildirim, D. C. & Gedikh, A., 2020. Natural Resource Abundance , Financial Development and Economic Growth. Resources Policy, Volume 65.

·        Le, T. H., Chang, Y. & Park, D., 2016. Trade Openness and Environmental Quality : International Evidence. Energy Policy, Volume 92, pp. 45-55.

·        Majeed, N. T., Samreen, I., Tauqir, A. & Mazhar, M., 2020. The Asymmetric Relatgionship between Financial Development and Co2 Emissions:The Case of Pakistan. SN Applied Sciences , 2(5), pp. 1-11.

·        Poole, R. E. (2012). Global Governance and the Environment: Evaluating the Effectiveness of Global Governance in Tackling Contemporary Environmental Issues. Inquiries Journal, 4(6), 1/2. Retrieved February 09, 2024, from http://www.inquiriesjournal.com/articles/652/global-governance-and-the-environment-evaluating-the-effectiveness-of-g

·        Sanjay , B. B., 2022. Finance Management. [Online]
Available at: https://efinancemanagement.com/financial-management/financial-globalization
[Accessed 10 February 2024].

·        Solarin, S. A., Al-Mulali, U., Musah, I. & Ozturk, I., 2017. Investigating the Pollution Haven Hypothesis In Ghana :Empirical Investigation. Science Direct; Energy, Volume 124, pp. 706-719.

·        UNEP. (2016). Environmental governance: Strengthening global governance in an interconnected world - UNEP 2015 Annual Report. Retrieved February 09, 2024, from https://www.unep.org/resources/annual-report/environmental-governance-strengthening-global-governance-interconnected

·        Ulucak , Z. S., Ilkay , S. C., Ozcan , B. & Gedikli, A., 2020. Financial Globalisation and Environmental Degradation Nexus :Evidence from Emerging Economies. Science Direct: Resource Policy, August .Volume 67.

·        Wei, S., 2018. Managing Financial GLobalisation:A guide for developing countries based on the recent literature. Asian Development Bank Institute, January .Issue 804.

·        Yuan, T., & Li, L. (2022, April 19). Impact of Financial Inclusion and Globalization on Environmental Quality . Environmental Science and Pollution Research , 29(10), 61265-61276. doi:10.1007/s